Business Owners are very much interested in the information related to asset protection. This is mainly because they have already faced many big recessions in the past but want a security for their future to avoid any downturns. Another reason for this concern may be the promotions of the biggest and the latest schemes by the advocates, introduced in order to avoid predatory creditors either they are imagined or the real ones. Nevertheless this topic has vital importance for the business owners.
There are many methods to adopt by which owners can save their business assets. We know that businesses may be of the form like LLC (Limited Liability Company) or they may be a corporation. The business structures described are purely government-sanctioned and these ways can be used to avoid any personal claim on the business assets. There are many other techniques present that can be applied to save the business assets but those techniques are such that they are close to the legal and ethics boundaries. There are some basic rules that one should keep in mind while taking some potential steps regarding asset protection.
Asset Protection Should Be Done Before It’s Too Late
Jay Adkisson is a very famous name in this field and is an asset protection attorney. He has explained this basic rule very efficiently. According to him asset protection should be done at appropriate times and also when the situations are favorable. One must not cheat the present creditors for the sake of asset protection. No doubt asset protection has some time limits. One cannot protect their assets when they have pledged all of them for some kind of bank loan or they met any serious situation or accident or they have some big liabilities that tend to remove all of their assets.
Asset protection is not curative rather it is a prophylactic issue. If you are having a feel of fear that one day either your personal assets or business assets would get claimed then this is the very right time to take steps for the protection of your assets and to think of better strategies. As you do not only have to face some claims against your assets but you might be accused of fraudulent conveyance that is also a big issue to consider. This is just like adding up of file to the fire of the creditor’s.
50 Grey Shades Are There In Asset Protection
The rules related to tax laws are very much complex and involves many white and black techniques. But the laws regarding asset protection lie between white and black and are more like grey shades. The advisors of asset protection that are working along with the business owners on the case of sheltering assets use various techniques to handle the legal issues. Some of the advisors prefer LLC business structure because judgments are made as “Charging Orders”. In this structure the order limits the rights of the creditors and specifies how much of the actual assets will the creditor gets. Another suggestion given by the advisor involves change in venue of business from the registered venue to a new one. This is because the laws related to asset protection give more security to the debtors making it hard for the creditors to take legal actions. Another technique for protecting the assets is that the ownership of the business should be given to some trust. This would present a difficulty to the creditors in identification of the actual owners of the business. These techniques are just used as defense against the hinder created by the creditors but there is no guarantee that either these tactics are going to work out for you or not.
The Matter Is About The State
For having the sound knowledge about the protection of assets, one should be aware of the seminars regarding asset protection where a large number of business owners from different states are present at the seminar. The laws about the asset protection vary from state to state as there is a big role of state in this matter. Take life insurance as an example which is considered as asset protected. In actual all the matters largely depend on the state that is involved in the issue. In the state of California life insurance receives very less security from the creditors whereas in the state of Florida it is given substantial protection. In business world these changing rules have very much importance. Some of the business owners choose the states like Nevada or Delaware for performing operations related to the creditor activities. Rest of the states fall under the category of “Creditor Friendly”. Changing a state for the sake of asset protection is not a very useful technique and in some cases the court may also not allow the owner for changing the state.
Does Asset Protection Worth This Effort
Taking steps for the protection of assets require heavy costs. As the techniques used for this purpose involve gift taxes, triggering income and changes in ownership. Changing the ownership of the business can also result in limiting the access on the assets. But one should be assured that to avoid the claim of the creditor, is it worthy that the owner should pay tax and limit his/her authority on the assets. For securing the assets of the business the business owner should consider the advice of both the cost benefit analysis and asset protection expert as they will present the most efficient structure for the business.
Asset protection must not be considered as an ultimate goal of the business rather it should be handled as an aspect related to the business planning or the estate or personal planning. Asset protection techniques must be applied carefully as the results would not always be the same as desired. Considering the example of California State where a debtor tends to transfer the ownership to the trust for the purpose of asset protection was sued because this act presents the professional negligence and fraudulently transfers of assets. So the result was quite opposite according to the wish of the debtor.
August 28, 2013
April 3, 2013
February 5, 2013
January 23, 2013
January 23, 2013